An Exegetical Reflection on the Gospel of the Fourth Sunday of Lent, Year C, Luke 15:1-3.11-33, March 10, 2013
HOW DO WE TREAT the members of our community who do not behave according to the standard of the dominant society? In today’s Gospel, we have an example of such a person: a prodigal son who, selfish and extravagant, got his inheritance and squandered his money with whores and on dissolute living. Having become destitute, he even longed to eat the husks that were fodder for pigs, but no one gave him anything (Luke 15:12-16). Philosophers might describe him as a short-lived epicurean—“Eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die”—but we who have no leisure for the abstract would call him profligate. Obviously, such a man has nothing to contribute to progress and development. On the contrary, if his behavior were conducted at a national level, he would ruin the economy. We really have no use for him. How do we treat people like him? In our society, we expect him to be in jail, if merely to ignore him would not suffice. Of course, he has nothing that we can be proud of; we would disinherit him for shaming us. Such is our usual thinking and attitude. But as Christians, how do we deal with such a person?
The parable, which is
traditionally known as the parable of the prodigal son, provides two answers we
can learn from. The first one is given
by the elder son. Having learned that
his profligate brother was back, he did not even bother to see him, still less
join the merrymaking. For him, since his
brother was unredeemable, dissolute and sinful, the book should be thrown at
him. He should suffer the consequences
of his action. Having squandered his
share of the estate and therefore having lost his rights to partake what now
belongs to him, why should he receive ring, the finest robe and a new pair of
shoes? Why give a party and kill the
fatted calf? (Luke 15:22-23). Since he
sinned seriously, he did not deserve this royal welcome. There is simply no justice there, especially
in view of the fact that his Father did not even give him, the elder brother,
so much as a kid goat to celebrate with his friend, even though he never
disobeyed his orders (Luke 15:29). Logically enough, he would not join a sinner
in a party. The thinking and attitude of
the elder son is easily identified with those of the Pharisees and
Scribes. They criticized Jesus for
welcoming sinners into his company, and eating with them.
The second one is
given by the father. In the parable, the
Father of the two sons was so loving to his prodigal, younger son that he did
not even allow him to finish his prepared piece. What was important to him was that he was
back, and so it was time to hold feast.
He overlooked the sinfulness of his son; instead of severely
reprimanding his son, he embraced him without any criticism, recriminations,
but with total forgiveness and mercy.
The fact is, he had been longing for his son to come back (Luke 15:20a). And now that he was back, it was time to put
the past into oblivion and to make merry:
“Let us eat and celebrate because this son of mine was dead and has come
back to life. He was lost and is found”
(Luke 15:23). Such an attitude and
behavior may be, in our very human, all too human thinking, very inappropriate,
for we usually think that one must first pay his debts before he could be
accepted to the normal society. But
God’s behavior is different from ours.
And that is how he wants us to behave and treat the sinful members of
our community. That explains why Jesus
welcomed sinners and ate with them. God
is generous and extravagant in his love.
Like the father in the parable, he takes the initiative in reconciling
himself with sinners. Paul explicitly
asserts: “It is precisely in this that God proves his love for us: that while
we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom 5:8). In Christ, he even went to the extent of
identifying himself with them: “For our sakes God made him who did not know sin
to be sin, so that in him we might become the very holiness of God” (2 Cor
5:21). That is why it is preferable to
title this story as a parable of a father’s love, instead of the parable of the
prodigal son, for the focus, no doubt about it, is God’s love for sinners. His love is so different from ours!
No comments:
Post a Comment